I've now boldly walked in the footsteps of Curious George.And whereas the images we remember from children's books are typically met with jarring contrast to their real-world equivalents, Berkeley's Scharffen Berger lives up to the expectation, long reinforced by childhood stories, that chocolate factories are quirky and fantastical places. Instead of a massive faceless production line hidden out in a low-rent Nowheresville, the Scharffen Berger factory is tucked into a small old brick building in a tree-lined neighborhood, and it's jammed full of antique European machines, plodding along noisily in their decadently inefficient and low-yield ways to produce the good stuff. And they let people in for tours.
One of the few real chocolatiers chocolate makers in the country, Scharffen Berger has only recently passed their ten-year mark, but early in their history, established themselves as something special. A 'best in the country' endorsement from the late Julia Child, followed by a more recent acquisition by Hershey (shhh!), and Scharffen Berger has taken the title as American chocolate bellwether.
Apparently, the secret has to do with sourcing properly fermented cacao, being very picky about it, and tailoring each tiny batch carefully, eschewing the more efficient quick-to-market methods employed by brands with larger market share to preserve. Oh, and ensuring that even their milk chocolate, long a boo-hooed lowbrow cousin style to the revered dark chocolate, has a higher percentage of cocoa solids than several of their dark chocolates - that doesn't hurt.
Having sat through several How It's Made tours and demonstrations for countless other foods, I was pleased to see that the Scharffen Berger tour is designed to enlighten even the most obsessed foodie. I had heard faint murmurs about this fermentation of cacao, but didn't know much about the process. To my delight, our Scharffen Berger guide provided a well-informed description, followed by photos, followed by actual beans to touch, and was able to answer questions intelligently!
He led us on a hairnetted walkthrough, reportedly the only one in the country that allows photos, then left us free to indulge our whims in the shop. No quick slick video and a high-pressure cattle prod into the gift shop here...although the siren song of chocolate pretty much does the job itself.
This is a passion-driven example of real food, well-deserving of its accolades, and with a factory as fun as its product. Other food manufacturers, take note!
Having sat through several How It's Made tours and demonstrations for countless other foods, I was pleased to see that the Scharffen Berger tour is designed to enlighten even the most obsessed foodie. I had heard faint murmurs about this fermentation of cacao, but didn't know much about the process. To my delight, our Scharffen Berger guide provided a well-informed description, followed by photos, followed by actual beans to touch, and was able to answer questions intelligently!
He led us on a hairnetted walkthrough, reportedly the only one in the country that allows photos, then left us free to indulge our whims in the shop. No quick slick video and a high-pressure cattle prod into the gift shop here...although the siren song of chocolate pretty much does the job itself.
This is a passion-driven example of real food, well-deserving of its accolades, and with a factory as fun as its product. Other food manufacturers, take note!
5 comments:
Unfortunately Scharffen-Berger is part of Hershey, a company that is lobbying the FDA to weaken standards so they can adulterate chocolate with vegetable fat other than cocoa butter (i.e. margarine) yet still legally be able to call it "chocolate" rather than "mockolate". If you buy from Scharffen-Berger, excellent as they may be, you are financially supporting the scum at Hershey.
That's the reason why I boycott Hershey affiliates like Scharffen-Berger, Joseph Schmidt and Dagoba.
There are plenty of other chocolatiers in the Bay Area like Guittard, Charles Chocolatier or Michael Rechiuti, so it's not a big sacrifice to boycott Hershey. Guittard is much better than Scharffen-Berger anyway.
Fazal –
Thanks for the interest and the comments. Without delving into my personal views on the merits of boycotts, I will reiterate that I am firmly committed to the principles of fairly traded, honestly produced, and additive-free foods. It’s the reason I started this blog, and the reason that I’ve written about Scharffen Berger here. It’s good honest chocolate, and deserves support.
In response to the FDA chocolate classification issue to which you refer, I should point out that Guittard, the revered Bay Area institution and a large chocolate maker which you propose as an alternative, is, along with Hershey and Mars and Nestle, one of the nine members of the Chocolate Manufacturer’s Association, supporting the classification change you oppose.
A point of clarification -- in my original post, I mistakenly referred to Scharffen Berger as a chocolatier, which Charles Chocolates and Michael Recchiuti are. In fact, I meant to call Scharffen Berger a “chocolate maker”, as they, along with Guittard, are one of the few in the US. This point further weakens your argument that choosing these products has any impact on the issue, because the Charles Chocolates and Michael Recchiuti people aren’t making their own chocolate in the first place – they’re confectioners! (And damned fine ones, I may add…)
Please learn more about this issue before you call for boycotts. Thanks.
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/4/20/15517/3113
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0085/07p-0085-cp00001-01-coverletter-vol1.pdf
http://www.chocolateusa.org/About-Us/our-members.asp
Someone has their 'facts wrong"...
Let it be perfectly clear ~
Guittard does NOT support Docket 2007p-0085.
Guittard does NOT support the proposed FDA changes.
Please see Guittard's website to see where they stand on this iusse:
Guittard's website:
http://dontmesswithourchocolate.guittard.com/theissue.asp
Chicago Reader / The Food Chain:
http://blogs.chicagoreader.com/food/tag/Guittard/
San Francisco Examiner article –
interviewing Gary Guttard, owner of Guittard Chocolate Co:
http://www.examiner.com/a-676026~It_looks_like_chocolate___but_is_it_.html
Docket 2207p-0085
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0085/07p-0085-cp00001-02-vol1.pdf
Someone previously stated the facts wrong.
So let it be perfectly clear ~
Guittard does NOT support Docket 2007p-0085.
Guittard does NOT support the proposed FDA changes.
Please see Guittard's website to see where they stand on this iusse:
Guittard's website:
http://dontmesswithourchocolate.guittard.com/theissue.asp
Chicago Reader / The Food Chain:
http://blogs.chicagoreader.com/food/tag/Guittard/
San Francisco Examiner article –
interviewing Gary Guttard, owner of Guittard Chocolate Co:
http://www.examiner.com/a-676026~It_looks_like_chocolate___but_is_it_.html
Docket 2207p-0085
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0085/07p-0085-cp00001-02-vol1.pdf
Laura --
I humbly recognize that I made a critical error when researching this issue. Guittard is indeed opposed to this FDA change, and I certainly got my facts wrong. Thank you for bringing this to my attention.
Having said that, I will reiterate my opposition to Fazal's original suggestion. I strongly believe that boycotting a small firm that is doing good work is an irresponsible and excessively harmful way to punish a larger corporate benefactor. Fazal's conclusion that Scharffen Berger be boycotted is too simplistic a solution to what is an issue worthy of attention. Honest food categorization and labeling is a noble cause, but not one for which I would want to see a good artisanal producer made a martyr.
Post a Comment